“Which is best? Which is fastest? Which is fairest? Which is the least expensive?” These, and many more questions have been asked over the years regarding the best method of resolving disputes. And oftentimes, the answer depends upon those you ask. So, let’s break the issue down to bite-size bits:

Defining the Terms.[1]  The term “litigation” generally denotes “court”. In its most basic format, there is a “plaintiff” (who is generally seeking a remedy either in damages, or  performance, or some other form of relief) and a “defendant” (who is resisting, or defending against the legal action). Continue reading “Oregon Real Estate Disputes – Litigation vs. Mediation & Arbitration (Part I)”

In its simplest form, an easement is a “right of use”.  The legal definition in ORS 105.170 is a bit more arcane:

Easement means a nonpossessory interest in the land of another which entitles the holders of an interest in the easement to a private right of way, embodying the right to pass across another’s land.

Holders of an interest in an easement means those with a legal right to use the easement, including the owner of the land across which the easement passes if the owner of the land has the legal right to use the easement.

Continue reading “QUERIN LAW: Statutory Easements Rights In Oregon”

The “procuring cause” rule is simple in theory, but complicated in application. It is used to determine a buyer broker’s entitlement to the “offer of compensation” (i.e. a percentage share of the commission offered by the listing broker on the multiple listing service). All Realtors® must publish an “offer of compensation” in their listings, so that other members are informed, up-front, how much they will received, should they produce a ready, willing and able buyer, who closes the transaction. Continue reading “QUERIN LAW: Realtor Commission Disputes and Procuring Cause Issues”

National Low Income Housing Coalition, May 29, 2018.  President Trump signed into law a permanent extension of the “Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act” (PTFA) on May 24. The PTFA was included in a larger deregulation bill (S. 2155) passed by the House on May 22. The PTFA, which expired at the end of 2014, enables renters whose homes were in foreclosure to remain in their homes for at least 90 days or for the term of their lease, whichever is greater. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Representative Keith Ellison (D-MN) had earlier introduced legislation (S. 325/HR 915) to permanently extend the PTFA. Making the PTFA permanent has long been an NLIHC policy priority. According to the bill, the PTFA provisions take effect 30 days after the date of enactment of the Act. [MORE: Go to link here.]

 

fighting over money

The “procuring cause” rule is simple in theory, but complicated in application. It is used to determine a buyer broker’s entitlement to the “offer of compensation” (i.e. a percentage share of  the commission offered by the listing broker on the multiple listing service). All Realtors must publish an “offer of compensation” in their listings, so that other members are informed, up-front, how much they will received, should they produce a ready, willing and able buyer, who closed the transaction.

To be clear, listing brokers do not have to prove they were a procuring cause of the sale – they have the written listing contract that essentially guarantees them a commission, even if they do nothing more than take the listing and place it in the MLS.

However, the buyer’s broker, who in most cases does not have a written service agreement with their client, generally must “prove” that their activity resulted in the sale, should a dispute arise between two buyer brokers claiming the compensation offered in the MLS. If there is no dispute, the buyer’s broker simply informs escrow of the amount of commission they are entitled to, and – assuming there is no disagreement with the listing broker over the figures – waits for closing to collect their share of the commission. [MORE: Go to link here.]

Mortgages. ORS 86.010 to 86.275 generally address the rights and duties of lenders and borrowers owning land secured by a mortgage.  The process of foreclosing a mortgage is set forth in ORS Chapter 88. The process of executing on a residential property is controlled by ORS 18.901 – 18.982.  Under these statutes, the main features of a residential mortgage and a residential mortgage foreclosure are the following:

  • Parties – There are two parties to a mortgage:
  • Mortgagee, who is the lender;
  • Mortgagor, who is the borrower.
    • Mortgagor’s right to cure – Upon acceleration of the remaining indebtedness under a promissory note, it becomes immediately due and owing. There is no statutory right to cure by tendering the amount then in default.
    • Right of redemption – Following the sheriff’s sale, there is a statutory 180-day period within which the mortgagor has a right to redeem the property by paying the amount paid at the sale, plus interest, taxes and certain other costs. 
    • Timing of judicial foreclosure – The recording on the public record of a Lis Pendens under ORS 93.740 and filing and service of the summons and complaint, commence the mortgage foreclosure process.  Since timing is controlled by the speed and efficiency of the attorney handling the foreclosure suit and the court processing it, the procedure can be very slow –   much slower than the non-judicial foreclosure of a trust deed discussed below.
    • Deficiency liability – Subject to the following exception, upon completion of the judicial foreclosure of real property, there is a right to pursue the mortgagor for a deficiency.  The foreclosure process is entirely judicial, and is conducted in much the same manner as a suit for collection of any other debt. The mortgagee has no claim against the mortgagor for any remaining deficiency under the promissory note if the property foreclosed is a primary residence. [See, ORS 86.770(2)]

Trust Deeds.  Virtually all voluntary liens secured by Oregon real estate are trust deeds and are therefore governed by the Oregon Trust Deed Act, ORS 86.705 – 86.795, which has been in existence since 1959.  The main features of the Act are the following:

  • Parties – There are three parties to a trust deed:
  • Beneficiary, who is the lender;
  • Trustor or Grantor, who is the borrower;
  • Trustee, who has two primary functions:
    • Upon payment in full of the promissory note, the Trustee, at the Beneficiary’s instruction, issues a Deed of Reconveyance for recording, thus removing the trust deed as a lien on the real property; or
    • Upon notification by the Beneficiary that the Grantor is in breach of the note or trust deed, the Trustee is authorized to commence a non-judicial foreclosure and sell the property at a public sale.
    • Grantor’s right to cure – Notwithstanding that the promissory note contains an acceleration clause, the Act permits the Grantor to cure the existing default up to five days before the scheduled sale date.  The right to cure also includes the payment of statutory costs and fees.
    • Right of redemption – Following the Trustee’s sale, there is no right of redemption to the Grantor. 
    • Timing and nonjudicial nature of foreclosure – The recording of a Notice of Default triggers the trust deed foreclosure process; a Notice of Sale is sent to the Grantor.  Both documents contain the sale date, which can be no sooner than 120 days before the Notice of Sale. At the time of default, the Beneficiary usually substitutes the current Trustee, who is normally a title insurance company, transferring the foreclosure process to a trustee foreclosure service qualified under ORS 86.790.
    • Deficiency liability – Following the completion of the non-judicial foreclosure of a property, the Beneficiary has no claim against the Grantor for any remaining deficiency under the promissory note. However, the completion of a non-judicial sale does not extinguish the liability of any guarantor of the debt. [See, ORS 86.770(2)]

Beneficiaries may elect to foreclose a trust deed judicially, as if it were a mortgage.  In doing so, the mortgage foreclosure process must be followed, which means the process occurs in court and there is a 180-day right of redemption.  However, there is no right to obtain a deficiency against the borrower if the property was a residential trust deed, as defined by ORS 86.705(5).

Practice Tip:  Practitioners should be aware of ORS 86.157, which provides that following a short sale, if the “…lender reports to the Internal Revenue Service that as a consequence of or in conjunction with a short sale of residential property the lender has canceled all or a portion of a borrower’s debt under a real estate loan agreement and the lender provides to the borrower written evidence of the lender’s report to the Internal Revenue Service, the lender or an assignee of the lender may not bring an action or otherwise seek payment for the residual debt following the short sale.”  Of course, it is always best to obtain written confirmation from the lender at the time of the short sale closing that it will waive, forgive or cancel the deficiency. 

Land Sale Contracts.  With only a few exceptions, land sale contracts are not governed by Oregon statutory law. The major exceptions are as follows:

  • In addition to the seller’s judicial and non-judicial remedies described in the contract, ORS  93.905 – 93.940 provides a means of statutorily declaring a “forfeiture” through a non-judicial foreclosure process. However, the statutory process should be expressly described in the contract as one of the seller’s available remedies.
  • The rules of execution on a judgment of foreclosure of residential property set forth in ORS 18.901 – 18.999 apply to land sale contracts, including the right of redemption.

A land sale contract presupposes that the title is retained by the seller pending full payment.  Upon that event, the seller will convey a “Fulfillment Deed” to the buyer, which then is recorded and removes the lien of the land sale contract from the property.

Beautiful Luxury Home Exterior with Green Grass and Landscaped yard

Carbon Monoxide Alarms.

Residential Landlord-Tenant

  • ORS 90.316 Carbon monoxide alarm defined;
  • ORS 90.317 Repair or replacement of carbon monoxide alarms;
  • ORS 90.320 Landlord’s habitability obligations include a functioning carbon monoxide alarm if the premises includes a carbon monoxide source;
  • ORS 90.325 Requires tenant to replace batteries as need; prohibits tampering.

Residential Sales

  • ORS 105.464 requires disclosure in the seller’s property disclosure statement whether there is a working carbon monoxide alarm in the home.
  • ORS 105.836 defines “carbon monoxide alarm”; mandates functions; requires conformance to State Fire Marshall rules. (See, http://www.oregon.gov/OSP/SFM/Pages/index.aspx)
  • ORS 105.838 provides that “A person may not convey fee title to a one and two family dwelling or multifamily housing that contains a carbon monoxide source, or transfer possession under a land sale contract of a one and two family dwelling or multifamily housing that contains a carbon monoxide source, unless one or more properly functioning carbon monoxide alarms are installed in the dwelling or housing at locations that provide carbon monoxide detection for all sleeping areas of the dwelling or housing.”
  • ORS 105.840 provides that “(a) purchaser or transferee of a one and two family dwelling or multifamily housing who is aggrieved by a violation of ORS 105.838 or of a rule adopted under ORS 476.725 may bring an individual action in an appropriate court to recover the greater of actual damages or $250 per residential unit. In any action brought under this section, the court may award to a prevailing party, in addition to the relief provided in this section, reasonable attorney fees at trial and on appeal, and costs.” Actions brought under this section must be commenced within one year after the date of sale or transfer.
  • ORS 105.842 Prohibits tampering with carbon monoxide alarm in one and two family dwellings and multifamily housing.

Practice Tip:  Actual damages could be catastrophic.  Entire families have died from carbon monoxide poisoning.  Practitioners representing landlords – especially those that do not have professional third-party management – should emphasize the importance of having functioning carbon monoxide alarms in the premises at all times.

 Smoke Detectors. 

Residential Sales.ORS 479.250 – 479.305 govern the installation, use, and anti-tampering laws for smoke detectors in residential housing.

Landlord-Tenant.

  • ORS 479.255 Requires a smoke alarm or smoke detector in every dwelling unit covered by the Oregon Residential Landlord Tenant Law, ORS Chapter 90.
  • ORS 90.320 Landlord’s habitability obligations include a functioning smoke alarm or smoke detector
  • ORS 90.325 Requires tenant to replace batteries as needed; prohibits tampering
  • ORS 90.740 Requires landlord to install working smoke alarm
  • ORS 90.680 (manufactured home and floating home facilities) Requires that if a space or slip tenant is selling their home, that they give notice to any lienholder, prospective purchaser or person licensed to sell dwellings or homes, and the location of all properly functioning smoke alarms

Fireplace Inserts.  ORS 468A.460 – 468A.515 requires all sellers of “residential structures” to remove and destroy uncertified woodstoves or fireplace inserts prior to closing of the sale.  A “residential structure” includes: (1) any structure that contains one or more dwelling units and is four stories or less above grade; (2) a condominium, rental residential unit or other residential dwelling unit that is part of a larger structure, if the property interest in the unit is separate from the property interest in the larger structure; (3) a modular home constructed off-site; (4) a manufactured dwelling; or (5) a floating home.

  • Exclusions. The primary exclusions are pellet stoves, central wood fired furnaces, antique stoves, masonry fireplaces and masonry heaters.
  • Removal and Destruction.  This entails removal of the insert from the Property and destroying it. Woodstove retailers, chimney sweeps, or others may perform this task. Sellers removing an insert may take it directly to a metal scrap recycler or DEQ-approved landfill.  Seller must obtain a receipt from the contractor or business certifying that the insert has been destroyed.  DEQ has a disclosure form posted on its website that may be used to notify DEQ of the destruction of the insert.  [See link here.]
  • Failure to remove or destroy the insert does not invalidate the sale.  However, it may constitute a Class A misdemeanor and/or result in a civil fine.  [See, ORS 468A.990.]
  • Certification Label. A certified woodstove or fireplace insert is one that bears a certification label located on the back and issued by the Oregon DEQ or U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) which means that it has met certain particulate emission standards.  If the insert does not bear such a label, it is “uncertified,” and must be removed and destroyed.  Sellers who cannot access the back of their insert may look up the model number on the EPA’s certified woodstove list or call the manufacturer of the insert.
  • Responsibility. The seller is responsible for removal and destruction an uncertified insert located on the property. If the buyer accepts written responsibility for removal and destruction, the insert must be removed and destroyed by buyer within 30 days following the closing date of the sale.
  • Additional Regulations. Sellers of residential structures located in some rural counties and cities may have regulations that require homeowners to remove non-certified solid fuel heating devices when a home is sold.  Sellers and buyers in these areas should check with their local agency to determine if any other requirements might apply.
  • More Information: See: DEQ Woodstove FAQs link here; or Contact: DEQ – Heat Smart Program, 811 SW Sixth Ave., Portland, OR 97204; See ORS 468A.

In part two of a three-part series, glean talking points about your experience in the field, which will come in handy if clients object to the amount they’re paying you.

JUNE 2018 | BY TONYA EBERHART AND MICHAEL CARR

Even if you’re armed with vast amounts of knowledge of the industry, it isn’t very valuable without experience. To use a sports analogy, imagine that Michael Jordan had all the skills necessary to be a basketball phenomenon in his early teens but never put them to use. Would he be the hoops superstar he is today? Without the experience of playing the game, the short answer is no.

You are no different. Without experience dealing with the ups and downs of the real estate market, you wouldn’t have the answers to the critical questions your clients seek. Is a certain obstacle to the transaction really a deal breaker? Why are certain homes selling faster than others in a particular area? Which marketing tools have been proven to work best to attract a specific customer? Which negotiating tactics are likely to move things to the closing table faster? In the second part of a three-part series, let’s look at how your experience supports your commission with tips drawn from our book, 31 Reasons Your Real Estate Agent Is Worth Their Commission. [MORE: Go to link here.]

In part one of a three-part series, learn how to explain to prospects and clients that your specific real estate knowledge is worth the money they’ll pay for your services.

MAY 2018 | BY TONYA EBERHART AND MICHAEL CARR

Everyone wants to feel appreciated, and you’re no different. You want your clients to see the value you bring to the transaction, but many real estate professionals are timid about tooting their horn to prospects and clients. You don’t want to come off as self-important, but you do want to educate customers about what you do—and most importantly, why you’re worth a commission check. Particularly in this digital age, where face-to-face communication is becoming scarcer, you might hear some of these aggravating comments: [MORE: Go to link here.]

The same factors that have affected area real estate for the last few years—limited inventory and an influx of new people to the area—are still in play. According to Business Oregon’s website, which gets its information from the Bureau of Labor, Bend’s current median home price is $404,000 and the median household income is $60,404.
At a real estate forecast breakfast this week, put on by the Central Oregon Association of Realtors, Hayden Homes’ Geoff Harris said that someone earning $60,000 per year is about $140,000 short of being able to afford the median house cost. Molly Brundage, with BrundageSmith real estate, said there’s only one house in Bend that’s currently for sale under $300,000, which is still too expensive for a standard household.  [MORE: Go to link here]