Introduction. On February 9, 2012, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a press release announcing the “landmark” $25 billion dollar settlement with five of the largest Big Banks. On February 9, 2012 President Obama told the nation that the $25 billion settlement was: “…about standing up for the American people, holding those who broke the law accountable, restoring confidence in our housing market and our financial sector, getting things moving.”
But was it? Were those who broke the law held accountable and if so, how? The purpose of this post is not to criticize the settlement or those who fashioned it. Rather, my purpose is to examine a major financial component of the settlement, to determine if, as touted, those who “broke the law” will, in fact, be held “accountable.”
Background. In June, 2010, Jeffrey Stephan, a low level employee at Ally Financial, admitted in deposition that he routinely signed hundreds of foreclosure notices daily without reviewing the underlying facts supporting the case. This astounding practice, which was later revealed to be SOP in most Big Bank foreclosures, introduced a new verb into the American lexicon: “Robo-signing.” While banking apologists were quick to characterize these acts as “technical paperwork problems,” no amount of spinning could erase the fact that people were being foreclosed out of their homes through the widespread use of fraudulent documents.
Over the following few months, we learned that a variety of laws were routinely being broken: (a) Documents were signed by persons who had no familiarity with the facts leading up to the underlying foreclosure; (b) Affidavits were sworn to as fact, when affiants had no knowledge of what they were swearing to; (c) Forged or falsified documents were regularly submitted into court as a part of judicial foreclosures; (d) notaries routinely violated state notarization laws; and (e) official titles, such as “Assistant Vice President,” were handed out to low level employees or subcontractors, to sign legal documents, as if acting in an official capacity.
Shortly after the revelations, the attorneys general of all 50 states joined together to bring claims against five of the largest banks for their servicing[1] misdeeds: (1) Bank of America Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina [together with BAC Home Loans Servicing, formerly Countrywide Homes Loans Servicing LP, Calabasas, California]; (2) Wells Fargo & Co., San Francisco, together with Wells Fargo Bank NA, Des Moines, Iowa; (3) JPMorgan Chase & Co., New York, along with JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Columbus, Ohio; (4) Citigroup Inc., New York, along with CitiMortgage, O’Fallon, Missouri; and (5) Ally Financial Inc., Detroit [formerly GMAC], along with GMAC Mortgage LLC, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania, and GMAC Residential Funding Co. LLC, Minneapolis.
The complaint filed by the A.G.s included claims of unfair and deceptive loan servicing, foreclosure processing, loan origination practices, violations of the False Claims Act and Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, as well as various charges relating to the treatment of homeowners in bankruptcy. Continue reading “The National Mortgage Settlement – Will The Big Banks Pass The Buck?”